The Effect of Portfolio Assessment on the Development of Metadiscourse Awareness in EFL Learners' Writing in the Academic Context

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

University of Isfahan

Abstract

This paper aimed at probing the implementation of portfolio assessment in the writing classroom in an attempt to examine its effect(s) on EFL learners’ metadiscourse awareness. It addressed the following questions: Does portfolio assessment as a teaching technique have positive wash back effect on the participants’ achievement in their writing ability in an academic context? And to what extent do the students develop metadiscourse awareness in their writing by the treatment of portfolio assessment?
The participants were the students of English literature enrolled for their composition course. After being homogenized for their proficiency level, they were randomly divided into an experimental group (EG) and a control group (CG). As the treatment, portfolio assessment was employed as the teaching technique for the experimental group. Data was then subjected to different statistical procedures. The results of data analysis revealed that the participants in the EG outperformed those in the CG with regard to the achievement in their overall writing ability. Second, based on chi-square results, participants in the EG used metadiscourse markers more correctly and efficiently compared with those in the CG. The results of the present study may have some implications for teaching of writing to EFL learners.

Keywords

Brown,  D.  H.  (2004).  Language  assessment:  Principles  and  classroom practices. Pearson education, Inc.
 
Brown,  J.  D.,  &  Hudson,  T.  D.  (1998).  The  alternatives  in  language assessment.  TESOL Quarterly, 32, 653–675.
 
Chamot,   A.U.   and   O'Malley,   J.M..   (1994).   The   CALL   A   Handbook: Implementing the Cognitive Language Learning Approach. Reading,
 
MA: Addison Wesley.
 
Chapman, C. (1990). Authentic Writing Assessment. Practical   Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2,7.Retrieved from
 
http:ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=2&n=7
 
Clapham,  C.  (2000).  Assessment  and  testing.  Annual  Review  of  Applied Linguistics, 20, 147-161.
 
Crismore, A. (1984). The rhetoric of textbooks: Metadiscourse.  Curriculum Studies, 16, 279-296.
 
Elahinia, H. (2004). Assessmentofwritingthroughportfoliosand  achievement tests. Unpublished M.A thesis, Teacher Training  University, Iran.
 
 
Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal Metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse Journalof Pragmatics. 40, 1, 95-113
 
Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Performance-based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 5–30.
 
Faghih, E. and Rahimpour, S. (2009). Contrastive rhetoric of English and Persian written texts: metadiscourse in applied linguistics research articles. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, 92-107.
 
Genesee, F. and Upshur, J. A. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
Hamayan, E.V. (1995). Approaches to alternative assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 212-226.
 
Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996). Applying ethical standards to portfolio assessment of writing in English as a second language. In M.Milanovic and N. Saville (eds.) Performance testing, cognition and assessment. (151-162). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
Hancock, C. R.  (1994).  Alternative  assessment  and  second  language study: What and why?, The Ohio State University Retrieved from http://www.ERIC_Digests.com
 
Harris, M. (1997). Self-assessment of language         learning in formal settings. ELT, 51, 1. 1-8.
Henner-Stanchina, C. & Holec, H. (1985). Evaluation in an autonomous learning scheme. In P. Riley (ed.). Discourseand Learning. London: Longman.
 
Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and negotiation  of  academic knowledge. Text, 18, 349-82.
 
Intaraprawat, P., & Steffensen M. S.(1995). The Use of Metadiscourse in Good and Poor ESL Essays. JournalofSecond Language Writing,4, 3,253-272.
 
Khoshsima,  H.  (2006).  The  Washback  Effect  of  Alternative  Assessment
Techniqueson  Students’ Reading  Comprehension and  Writing  Ability.
 
 
Unpublished PhD Dissertation. University of Isfahan, Faculty of Foreign Languages.
 
Kormos, J. (1999). Simulating conversations in oral proficiency assessment: A conversation analysis of role play and non-scripted interviews in language exams.  Language Testing, 16, 163-188.
 
Lam,  R.    and  Lee,  I.  (2009).  Balancing  the  dual  functions  of  portfolio assessment.ELTJournal, 63, 4, 1-12.
 
Leung  C.  and  Lewkowicz.  J.(2006).  Expanding  Horizons  and  Unresolved
Conundrums: Language Testing and Assessment. TESOL Quarterly,40,1, 211-234.
 
Lucy, J. A. (Ed.). (1993). Reflexive language: Reported speech and meatpragmatics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
 
Lynch,   B.   (2001).   Rethinking   assessment   from   a   critical   perspective.
Language Testing, 18,351-72.
 
Lynch, B.  & Shaw, P. (2005). Portfolios, Power, and Ethics. TESOL Quarterly,
39, 263 – 297.
 
Marefat, F. (2004). Portfolio revisited. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7, 2, 79-96.
 
McNamara, T. (1996). Measuringsecond language performance. London: Longman.
 
O'Malley, J. M., and Valdez Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. New York: Addison-Wesley.
 
Paesani, K. (2006). Exercises de style: Developing multiple competencies through a writing portfolio. Foreign Language Annals,39 , 4, 618-39.
 
Papajohn, D. (1999). The effect of topic variation in performance testing: case of the chemistry TEACH test for international teaching assistance. Language Testing, 16, 1, 52-81.
 
Schiffrin, D. (1980). Meta-Talk: Organizational and Evaluative Brackets in Discourse. SociologicalInquiry:LanguageandSocial Interaction,50, 199-236.
 
Shaaban, K. (2001). Assessment of young learners. English Teaching Forum, 39, 4, 16-22.
 
 
Shohamy, E. (2001). Democratic assessment as an alternative. LanguageTesting, 18, 4, 373–391.
 
Simin, Sh. and Tavangar, M. (2009). Metadiscourse knowledge and use in Iranian EFL writing. Asian EFL Journal, 11, 1, 230-255.
 
Teasdale A. and Leung, C. (2000). Teacher assessment and psychometric theory: a case of paradigm crossing? Language Testing, 17, 2, 163–184.
 
Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on Meta-discourse.
College Communication and Composition, 36, 82-93
 
Valette, R. (1994). Teaching, testing and assessment: Conceptualizing the relationship. In C. Hancock (Ed.),Teaching, testing and assessment: Making the connection(pp.1-42).Lincolnwood,IL: National Textbook Company.