The Chaotic World and the Entropic Crisis in Thomas Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Kazeroon Islamic Azad University

2 Sheikhbahaee University

Abstract

Having its roots in science, “chaos theory” provides a new strategy to examine the disordered world of postmodern novels to find the hidden order underlying the apparent chaos. This study tries to clarify the ambiguous relation between Oedipa Maas, the “Tristero system” and the “Maxwell’s Demon” in Thomas Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49. Oedipa Maas, the main character of the novel is regarded as an “everyman” type character who tries desperately to make sense of the signs and mysteries proliferating around her, but she can never fulfill her quest because she is trapped in a chaotic world where there are no stable values, friends or meanings. She feels separated from the world around her and longs to regain the stability she used to have before she started her task as the “executrix” of her former lover’s vast estate. She does not manage to find “order” in the surrounding chaos, but applying the major tenets of chaos theory and examining concepts such as “the butterfly effect”, “bifurcations”, “strange attractors”, “recursive symmetry” and “entropy” , we can come to a better understanding of the order underlying the disordered world of the novel.

Keywords

Angrist, Stanley W. and Loren G. Hepler. Order and Chaos. Basic Books, 1967. Castillo, Debra A. (1992)."Borges and Pynchon: The Tenuous Symmetries of Art", in New Essays. Ed. Patrick O'Donnell, 21-46 (Cambridge University
Press).1992.
 
Dutta, Anindita. (2002) “The Paradox of Truth, the Truth of Entropy.” The
Modern Word. 16 May 2008.
 
Gleason, William. "The Postmodern Labyrinths of Lot 49." Critique 34.2, (winter, 1993): 83-99.
 
Gleick, James. Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Viking, 1987. Hawkins, Harriet. Strange Attractors: Literature, Culture and Chaos Theory,
Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf. 1995.
 
Hayles, N. Katherine. "Chaos as Orderly Disorder: Shifting Ground in Contemporary Literature and Science." New Literary History 20.2 (1989): 305-22.
 
 
 
--- . Chaos Bound: Orderly Disorder in Contemporary Literature and Science.
Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.
 
--- , ed. Chaos and Order: Complex Dynamics in Literature and Science.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
 
Heise, Ursula. “Between technophobia and utopia: Science and postmodern
literature”. 1996.28 Aug 2008
 
Kermode, Frank. The Use of Codes in The Crying of Lot 49" in: Thomas Pynchon. Ed. Harold Bloom. Chelsea House, New York, United States: 1986 : 1-14.
 
Lyons, Thomas R and Allan D. Franklin. “Thomas Pynchon's "Classic" Presentation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics”. The Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association. 27.4 ( Dec. 1973):195- 204 Published by: Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association Stable 6
 
Matheson, Carl and Evan Kirchhoff. (1997) “Chaos and Literature”, The John
Hopkins University Press,. Online version:
 
Palmeri, Frank. “Neither Literally nor as Metaphor: Pynchon's the Crying of Lot 49 and the Structure of Scientific Revolutions”. ELH, 54. 4 ( winter, 1987) : 979-999. Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press Online version. 15 Jul 2008 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2873106>
 
Pearce, Richard. "Pynchon's Endings".   NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction.   18.2. (1985) : 145-153.
 
Perez ,Carmen -llantada auria. “Fiction at a Bifurcation Point: from Newtonian Law to Postmodern Uncertainty in Pynchon's Mason & Dixon”. Oklahoma City. university law review. 24.3 (1999). 29 Jul 2008.
 
 
Prigogine, Ilya and Isabelle Stengers. O
rder Out of Chaos: Man‟s New
 
Dialogue with Nature. London: Flamingo, 1985.
 
 
Pynchon, Thomas. The Crying of Lot 49. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.
 
---. "Entropy." Slow Learner. New York: Little, Brown, & Co.,. 81- 98,1984.
 
Seed, David. “The Fictional Labyrinths of Thomas Pynchon”. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1988.
 
Slethaug, Gordon E. Beautiful Chaos: Chaos Theory and Metachaotics in Recent American Fiction. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000.
 
Salomon, Nicholas. Conspiracy or Delusion?: Paranoia in Thomas Pynchon's The Crying of Lot 49. BA thesis. Dept. of English, The University of North Carolina, 2007.
 
Ward, Brian. The Literary Appropriation of Chaos Theory. PhD thesis. Dept. of English, University of Australia,1998.
<http://www.indolentdandy.net/phd/>. 13 December 2006.
 
Salomon, Nicholas. “Conspiracy or Delusion?: Paranoia in Thomas Pynchon's The Crying of Lot 49”. (BA thesis, Dept. of English, The University of North Carolina).2007. Online version:<  http://toto.lib.unca.edu/sr_papers/literature_sr/seniorpap_lit.html> . 30 July 2008.
 
Ward, Brian. “The Literary Appropriation of Chaos Theory”. (PhD thesis,
Dept. of English, University of Australia,). 1998. Online version:
<http://www.indolentdandy.net/phd/>.  13 December 2006.
Volume 1, Issue 1
April 2012
Pages 83-98
  • Receive Date: 22 November 2018
  • Accept Date: 22 November 2018