A Comparative Study of Anticipatory it Lexical Bundles in Applied Linguistics and Analytical Chemistry Research Articles

Document Type: Original Article

Author

English Language Center, Isfahan University of Technology, Iran

Abstract

Lexical bundles, frequent word combinations that commonly occur in different registers, have attracted researchers in corpus linguistics in the last decade. While most previous studies of bundles have been mainly concerned with variations in the use of these word sequences across different registers, very few studies have focused on their use across disciplines. To address possible disciplinary variations in the use of these word combinations in academic register, this quantitative and qualitative study chose to investigate, compare, and contrast range, frequency, and function of anticipatory it bundles as a sub-set of these word clusters with important metadiscursive functions in published writing. For this purpose, the study zoomed in research articles of applied linguistics and analytical chemistry as a soft and hard science, respectively. The results indicated that generally anticipatory it bundles could be regarded as a distinctive characteristic of academic writing in both disciplines. At the same time, each discipline was found to draw almost on a particular set of it bundles in the development of its discourse. However, analytical chemistry seemed to rely more on these bundles in the development of its discourse. Functional analysis also showed that it bundles served a wide variety of functions in both disciplinary areas. Therefore, this study called for a more robust pedagogical focus on different multi-word sequences like anticipatory it lexical bundles. The findings also highlighted the importance of a more genre-focused EAP (English for academic purposes).

Keywords

Anthony, L. (2007). Antconc 3.2.1: A free text analysis software. Available on line at http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/.                                            

Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: Benjamin.         

Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers.  English for Specific Purposes, 26, 263-286.

Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (1999). Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In H. Hasselgard & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honor of Stig Johansson (pp. 181–189). Amsterdam:  Rodopi.

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2003). Lexical bundles in speech and writing: An initial taxonomy. In A. Wilson., P. Rayson, & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus linguistics by the lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech (pp. 71-92). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25, 371–405.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad S., & Finegan, E. (1999).  Longman grammar of spoken and written English Harlow: Pearson.

Cortes, V. (2002). Lexical bundles in academic writing in history and biology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University, Arizona.

Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 397–423.

Cortes, V. (2006). Teaching lexical bundles in the disciplines: An example form a writing intensive history class. Linguistics and Education, 17 (4), 391-406.

Hasselgard, H., Johansson, S., & Lysvag, P. (1998). English grammar. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

Hewings, M., & Hewings, A. (2002). "It is interesting to note that…..": A comparative study of anticipatory 'it' in student and published writing. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 367-383.

Hunston, S., & Sinclair, J. (2000). A local grammar of evaluation. In S. Hunston, & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text (pp. 74–101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in scientific research  articles. Applied Linguistics, 17, 433-454.

Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory coursebooks. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 3-26.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic writing. London: Longman.

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscousre in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 131-151.

Hyland, K. (2008a). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation.  English for Specific Purposes, 27 (1), 4-21.

Hyland, K. (2008b). Academic clusters: text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18 (1), 41-62.

Jacobs, R. A. (1995). English syntax: A grammar for English language professionals. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jalali, H. (2009). Lexical bundles in applied linguistics: Variations within a single discipline (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Isfahan University, Isfahan.

Jalali, H. (2013). Lexical bundles in applied linguistics: Variations across

        postgraduate genres. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Translation Studies, 2 (2), 1-29.

Jalali, H., Eslami Rasekh, A., & Tavangar Rizi, M. (2008). Lexical bundles and intradisciplinary variation: The case of applied linguistics. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 2 (4), 447-484.

 Jalali, H., Eslami Rasekh, A., Tavangar Rizi, M. (2009). Anticipatory ‘it’ lexical bundles: A comparative study of student and published writing in applied linguistics. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 3 (2), 177-194.

Jalali, H., & Ghayoomi, S. (2010). A comparative qualitative study of lexical bundles in three academic genres of applied linguistics. Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2 (4), 323-333.

Levy, A. S. (2003). Lexical bundles in professional and student writing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of the Pacific, San Francisco.

Lewis, M. (2000a).  Learning in the lexical approach. In M.  Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation. Further developments in the lexical approach (pp. 155–185). Hove:Language Teaching Publications.

Lewis, M. (2000b). Materials and resources for teaching collocation. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Teaching collocation. Further developments in the lexical approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.

Scott, M. (2008). Wordsmith Tools 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader.  Applied linguistics, 22 (1), 58-78.

Valipoori Goodarzi, L. (2010). A corpus-based study of words and bundles in chemistry research articles (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Kashan, Iran.